Symphonie Nr. 2 Resurrection 馬勒．古斯塔夫 交響曲 總譜 環球版

多年來，馬勒的《第二交響曲》顯然需要一個新版本，原因有幾個。首先，自 1970 年埃爾溫-拉茨（Erwin Ratz）完成該交響曲的第一個評論版以來，這部作品有了許多新的資料來源，其中最重要的是馬勒的個人參考樂譜，他在其中記錄了將要進行的修改（他的最後一次記錄是在 1910 年 9 月）。第二個原因是近年來批判版的編輯標準大大加強。現在的樂譜都是電腦生成的。在此之前，對樂譜的修改只能通過對舊雕版的膠片進行潤色。電腦化還確保了樂譜與演出材料的一致性。在編輯方面，新版受益于擴充的文本，這些文本描述和評估了原始材料，記錄和解釋了編輯的決定，並提供了有關作品起源、已出版樂譜的歷史、演奏實踐等方面的詳細資訊。在過去的五年中，《第二交響曲》新版的編輯雷納爾-斯塔克-沃伊特和吉伯特-卡普蘭對每一個重要的資料來源都進行了鑒定、評估和分析，由於他們的工作，大量錯誤得到了糾正"

作曲家: Mahler, Gustav
編者: Kaplan, Gilbert / Stark-Voit, Renate
樂器: for soli, mixed choir (SATB) and orchestra
出版社: Universal Edition
原文簡介:
Over the years, the need for a new edition of Mahler's Symphony No. 2 became apparent for several reasons. First, many new sources for this work have become accessible since 1970, when Erwin Ratz completed the first critical edition of this symphony, the most significant being Mahler's personal reference score in which he recorded changes to be made (his last entries were made in September 1910). The second reason was the significant strengthening of the editorial standards of the critical edition in recent years. The music is now computer-generated. Previously, changes to the score could be made only by retouching the film of old engravings. Computerization also ensures a concurrence between the score and performance materials. Editorially, the new edition benefits from expanded texts that describe and assess the source materials, document and explain the editors' decisions and provide detailed information on the work's origin, the history of the published scores, performance practices, etc. Over the past five years, Renare Stark-Voit and Gilbert Kaplan, editors of the new edition of Symphony No. 2, have identified, evaluated and analyzed every significant source, and as a result of their work a substantial number of errors has been corrected.